7.9 In the event that the member has not taken appropriate measures to eliminate the negative effects of the grant or to withdraw the subsidy within six months of the adoption of the panel`s report or the appellate body`s report, the DSB gives the complaining member permission to take action. , depending on the degree and nature of the adverse effects, unless the DSB agrees to reject the application. 6.4 For the purposes of paragraph 3, point b), the transfer or impediment to export includes each case in which, subject to paragraph 7, it has been shown that the relative market shares have changed to the detriment of the similar unsubsidized product (over a period sufficiently representative enough to demonstrate a significant change in the market of the product concerned). which, under normal circumstances, must be at least one year old). The change in market share is one of the following situations: a) the market share of the subsidized product increases; (b) the market share of the subsidized product remains constant in circumstances where it would have declined without the subsidy; (c) the market share of the subsidized product is declining, but at a slower pace than would have been the case without the subsidy. 4.3 At the request of a consultation under paragraph 1, the alleged member granting or maintaining the grant in question will take these consultations as quickly as possible. The purpose of the consultations is to clarify the facts and reach an amicable solution. (iii) costs related to consulting services and equivalent services used exclusively for research, including purchased research, technical knowledge, patents, etc.; 6.6 Any member in the market who has suffered serious damage provides the parties to a dispute covered by Article 7 and the article 7, paragraph 4 proceeding with all relevant information concerning the evolution of the market shares of the parties to the dispute and the prices of the products concerned. 6.5 For the purposes of paragraph 3, point (c), price under-pricing includes each case where such under-pricing has been demonstrated by a comparison of the prices of the subsidized product with the prices of a similar unsubsidized product delivered to the same market. The comparison is made at the same commercial stage and at comparable times, taking due account of any other factors affecting price comparability. However, if such a direct comparison is not possible, the existence of price under-pricing can be established on the basis of export unit values.