My sign of the symbolism of the summit, its organization and its ability to take the right tone is certainly an A-Plus. As for the substance, there remains a big question mark, the central product of this historic meeting seems to be an agreement to do things that both sides have agreed on in the past. Case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only personnel pronouns and pronouns that have casus marking). The correspondence between these pronouns can sometimes be observed: in Scandinavian languages, adjectives (attributive and predicative) are rejected based on gender, number, and the determination of the noun they modify. In Icelandic and faroe islands, unlike other Scandinavian languages, adjectives are also rejected in the grammatical case. Although the name does not immediately reveal it, this paper is a case study of the interaction of verbal correspondence in Tagalog with the syntax of remote extraction and offers a fascinating perspective on the often expressed intuition that certain types of concordance are necessary precursors for certain types of syntactic movements. a comprehensive treatment of the morphosyntax of Germanic inflectional systems, couched in distributed morphology (DM; see Noyer 1997, cited as Morphologically Oriented Approaches; and Morris Halle and Alex Marantz, 1963, “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection”, in The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, published by Kenneth L Hale, Samuel Jay Keyser and Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-176). Although it is not only about convergence (but rather flexion in general), this work is very pioneering for the definition of the division of labor between morphology and syntax when it comes to formal processing of conformity in a minimalist/DM framework. Languages cannot have any conventional correspondence, such as Japanese or Malay; Little, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. A proposal for interaction between the case, the agreement, the form of time and the license of the subjects, based on data from both the adult language and the learning of the language. In Hungarian, verbs are polypersonal, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only with its subject, but also with its (precise) object. There is a distinction between the case where there is a particular object and the case where the object is indeterminate or where there is no object at all.
(Adverbians have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I like someone or something unspecified), more (I love him, she, she or she, in particular), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, us, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, him or her specifically). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is a correspondence between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often relates more or less precisely to the person). . . .